Illustrations Atomic Layer Etching (ALEt) Process
Fig:
Several approaches can be adopted for thin film deposition and etching for
vapor phase based techniques. (a) In a continuous process, the process A is
started at t = 0 and stopped after the deposited or etched thickness has been
reached. In this basic approach, the control of the deposited or etched
thickness is limited as the deposited or etched thickness is "flux-controlled".
Variations in the process conditions easily lead to variations in the flux of
species and hence, in the final deposited or etched thickness, both over
multiple deposition runs (i.e., wafer-to-wafer) or over the substrate area
(i.e., within-wafer). (b) In a pulsed process, the continuous process is
basically divided up into pulses and the pulses are repeated until the
deposited or etched thickness has been reached. When the pulse length is
well-defined, pulsing provides typically additional control over the continuous
process but due to the flux-controlled nature similar drawbacks as in the
continuous process hold. (c) Atomic layer processes are "surface-controlled" as
they are based on self-limiting surface chemistries during, e.g., two
half-reactions (A and B) that make up a full cycle. Every cycle yields a
well-defined, fixed thickness that is deposited or etched when the time per
cycle for the half-cycles is sufficiently long (i.e., when working in
"saturated conditions"). This means that the thickness of the deposited or
etched film can be controlled very accurately by choosing the right number of
cycles. This holds when comparing one deposition run to another but it also
leads to an excellent uniformity over the full substrate. Ideal atomic layer
processes are very independent of variations in timings or process conditions.
Fig:
Schematic representation of one complete, generalized cycle of (a) atomic layer
etching (ALEt) and (b) atomic layer deposition (ALD). In (c), the so-called
saturation curves for the various steps in the ALEt and ALD processes are
schematically illustrated. The depicted processes consist of two half-reactions
A and B and the total cycle is divided into four process steps. Step 1 is the
"adsorption step" and step 3 is the "activation step". In these steps, the
surface is exposed to reactants, here defined as "precursor" in step 1 and
"co-reactant" in step 3. Steps 2 and 4 are "purge steps". The cycles, and hence
the process steps, are repeated multiple times when etching or depositing a
film. Every cycle removes or adds an atomic layer from or to the film for ALEt
and ALD, respectively. The saturation curves show that exposure to the
reactants in steps 1 and 3 should be sufficiently long to reach saturation. The
purging in between these steps should be sufficiently long to avoid parasitic
CVD or parasitic etch reactions that compromise the ALEt or ALD character of
the processes.
Fig:
Schematic illustration of the key features for (a) atomic layer etching (ALEt)
and (b) atomic layer deposition (ALD). The processes yield a precise control of
the thickness etched (etch control) or deposited (growth control) per cycle for
ALEt and ALD, respectively. The latter holds for the full substrate surface
such that the uniformity is excellent. When processing a substrate with
three-dimensional features, the situation for ALEt and ALD is however
different. For ALD, the coverage of three-dimensional features is similar
throughout the features and comparable to the planar surface, hence the
conformality of ALD-prepared films is excellent. For etching processes such as
ALEt, there is generally interest in etching vertical features which requires
anisotropic processes in which only material is removed from the bottom of the
vertical feature. In other cases, isotropic etching can be desired. In this
case, the material should be etched equally on all exposed surfaces,
independent of the orientation of the local surface on the substrate. For ALEt,
also the selectivity of the etch process is key. Ideally, only the to-be-etched
material should be removed and not masking materials or materials lying
underneath the to-be-etched material.
Fig:
Approaches to realize area-selective ALD [(a), (c) and (e)] and area-selective
ALEt [(b), (d) and (f)]. (a) and (b) show an approach that can be labeled
"inherently selective". The substrate is composed of several materials and on
the surface of some of the materials, deposition or etching does (virtually)
not occur for the ALD or ALEt surface chemistry chosen. The selectivity is
therefore, inherent to the specific ALD or ALE process. (c) and (d) show an
approach that can be labeled as "selective by deactivation" since part of the
substrate is deactivated by a layer of molecules or a film (mask). No etching
or deposition takes place at the parts of the surface that are deactivated.
This approach is standard for etching. It is not problematic if the mask
material is somewhat etched as long as it etches much slower than the
to-be-etched material. (e) and (f) show an approach that can be labeled
"selective by activation". Film growth or etching only initiates on those parts
of the surface that are activated, e.g., by a focused electron or ion beam that
locally interacts with the surface. For ALD, processes exist in which this
activation only needs to be done before the first cycle; [ref] for ALEt, the local
activation step needs to take place every cycle. In all the displayed cases for
ALD [(a), (c) and (e)], the area-selective ALD processes depend on an effect
known as nucleation delay. The film material easily deposits on some surfaces
whereas on other areas, the film hardly nucleates or it takes much longer for
the film to nucleate. For area-selective ALEt approaches (b) and (d),
selectivity has the same meaning as that typical for etch processes. The
to-be-etched material should etch much faster than any other material used. In
(d), the selectivity should preferably approach infinity. Furthermore, it is
noted that the possibility exists for designing area-selective ALEt approaches
by combining ALEt and ALD. For example, area-selective ALD films can serve as a
local mask.
Fig:
A schematic representation of various types of cycles for ALD [ref] that can also
be employed for ALEt: (a) a regular process, (b) a multistep process and (c) a
supercycle process. In a multistep process, one or more additional steps are
added to the cycle to form, for instance, an ABC process. In a supercycle, the
steps of two regular processes are combined where m cycles of the first process
are followed by n cycles of the second process. The variables m and n can be
chosen so as to obtain the desired properties for the ALD or ALEt process.
Fig:
Approaches that are being used to increase the throughput of ALD reactors that,
in principle, can also be adopted for ALEt reactors. In (a), the approach is
shown where the process is not operated under fully saturated conditions. When
working with slightly shorter exposure times the cycle time can significantly
be reduced (e.g., by a factor of two) while the thickness deposited or removed
is only slightly reduced. For many processes and device architectures, the
level of growth or etch control remains acceptable. In (b), the so-called
spatial atomic layer process is shown. The cycles are not carried out in the
time domain but in the spatial domain. It is noted however, that developing
appropriate processes for spatial ALD is not straightforward and this is
probably even more so for spatial ALEt.